Detalhes bibliográficos
| Ano de defesa: |
2016 |
| Autor(a) principal: |
Pansonato, Fabiana |
| Orientador(a): |
Ferman, Bruno |
| Banca de defesa: |
Não Informado pela instituição |
| Tipo de documento: |
Dissertação
|
| Tipo de acesso: |
Acesso aberto |
| Idioma: |
por |
| Instituição de defesa: |
Não Informado pela instituição
|
| Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Não Informado pela instituição
|
| Departamento: |
Não Informado pela instituição
|
| País: |
Não Informado pela instituição
|
| Palavras-chave em Português: |
|
| Link de acesso: |
http://hdl.handle.net/10438/15957
|
Resumo: |
In Brazil, many credit bureaus have the role of providing the exchange of default information of consumers to the financial market. Such an exchange benefits banks and financial instituitions by reducing information asymmetry between the latter and borrowers. Recently, Laws 15.659 / 15 and 10.272 / 15 were implemented in two Brazilian states to protect consumers as they don’t allow inclusion of negative information in the case customers are unaware of their debt. As a result, the market could suffer a credit contraction and the consumer could take advantage of the law, failing to pay off debt. This paper proposes to develop an empirical strategy to verify if there is an increased adverse selection and moral hazard in the states in which the law has been applied. We conclude that the effect is small but consistent with the expected increase of default rates |
