Detalhes bibliográficos
| Ano de defesa: |
1983 |
| Autor(a) principal: |
Rangel, Lucilia Batista Azevedo |
| Orientador(a): |
Baeta, Anna Maria Bianchini |
| Banca de defesa: |
Não Informado pela instituição |
| Tipo de documento: |
Dissertação
|
| Tipo de acesso: |
Acesso aberto |
| Idioma: |
por |
| Instituição de defesa: |
Não Informado pela instituição
|
| Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Não Informado pela instituição
|
| Departamento: |
Não Informado pela instituição
|
| País: |
Não Informado pela instituição
|
| Link de acesso: |
http://hdl.handle.net/10438/8958
|
Resumo: |
The concern with the matter quality and quantity of learning in the academic level in Brasil, besides, the controversy aroused concerning the role of the Basic course in the Federal University of Espírito Santo, led to a deeper study of the difficulties of the teaching-learning process detected in subject of the Psychology I. A pilot survey showed the theoretical and methodological aspects that should be used. Starting from a theoretical reference, Karl Marx, Adam Schaff and Pierre Bourdieu were used when intending to analyse the formation of the human conscience (his vision of the world, of society and of himself). The Field Theory of Kurt Lewin was used as a more specific reference to what concerns the learning. In chapters 3 and 4, the problem was treated in a broader context together wi th approaches about the expansion of the academic leveI of learning in Brasil and the history of UFES. The empirical study was held in two school semesters. Professors of Psychology I were interviewed in order to check their ability to their function, their professional satisfaction and their view of the student and of the subject they teach. Questionnaires and interviews were applied to the Basic course students in order to gather data about their socio-economic level, motivation in what concerns their professional choice and their Psychology I. With the same objective, data were gathered from the Professional course students through questionnaires. The results showed that the difficulties were not essentially related to the theoretieal program that was developed as a pre-requisite to the other subjects of Psychology, specific to each professional course. It was clear that changes in the objectives and in the methodology to be adopted by the professors were needed so as to reach the students (bearrer of expectations, ideas, feelings, culture, level). At the end of the research, a pedagogics was proposed, directed to the group of professors of Psychology I from UFES. |
