Detalhes bibliográficos
Ano de defesa: |
2013 |
Autor(a) principal: |
Murga, Felipe Gonçalves |
Orientador(a): |
Irigaray, Hélio Arthur |
Banca de defesa: |
Não Informado pela instituição |
Tipo de documento: |
Dissertação
|
Tipo de acesso: |
Acesso aberto |
Idioma: |
por |
Instituição de defesa: |
Não Informado pela instituição
|
Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Não Informado pela instituição
|
Departamento: |
Não Informado pela instituição
|
País: |
Não Informado pela instituição
|
Palavras-chave em Português: |
|
Palavras-chave em Inglês: |
|
Link de acesso: |
http://hdl.handle.net/10438/11229
|
Resumo: |
The o rganizations are awa re that must deal with a complex process of organizational change, because the demands o f individual participation on decisions ha ve changed the roles of managers and their subordinates. In this context, the communication becomes essential to the exercise of social influence , on the coordination of activities and for effective leadership. The literature suggests that the attitudes and behaviors of the employees rel y on a fair distribution of rewards based on the contributions of each participant . Thus, an o rganizational environment with good communication, autonomy, participation, distributive justice and trust , leads to satisfaction and positive attitudes. Therefore, this work aimed to identify the dimensions of Leadership and Organizational Culture on the Criminal istic of the Federal Police and their relations hip with O rganizational C limate . This study is also concerned how these factors c ould expla i n the manage ment problems in the workplace . For data collection, it was used a quantitative survey with four questionnaires. Exactly 722 forms were sent and 150 (20.8 %) were returned: 21 (14 %) by experts of central unit , 126 (84 %) by experts of state units and 3 (2 %) by experts of other units. Respondents were between 30 and 64 years old (μ = 40.9, = 6.8), 1 - 32 years of public service (μ = 12.6, = 6.5) and 1 - 27 years of expertise (μ = 7.9, = 3.9) . Furthermore, 79 (52.7 %) participants had occupied leadership position . The results showed no difference in perceptions of Le adership, Culture and Organizational Climate among regions of the country, rejecting the hypothesis H6 of this work. In a longitudinal study between 2011 and 2013 , there was no significant changes in the perception of L eadership, showing consistency betwee n populations. Moreover, age, working life and years of expertise failed to show any association with Climate ; therefore, employees of different times have the same perception of the O rganization Climate . The structural equation modeling prov i d ed evidence that Leadership , Leadership Practices and Organizational Climate have strong correlation to their dimensions . It was also determined that Organizational Culture affects Leadership and Leadership Practices , but it affects Organizational Climate even more . T hese results support the theory and explain hypotheses of this work. I n the organization , t here was a predominance of bureaucratic subculture based on power and control . This subculture affects the O rganizational C limate and often has negative effect on em ployees’ commitment and performance. The research pointed out that leaders should encourage communication to achieve dialogic understanding in the organization. The findings of this study can provide leaders a better way to manage their resources with legi timacy, reference, knowledge and information, and obeying the assumptions of Habermas ’ ideal speech |