Detalhes bibliográficos
Ano de defesa: |
1983 |
Autor(a) principal: |
Schultz, Caiubi C. |
Orientador(a): |
Campos, Angela Valadares Dutra de Souza |
Banca de defesa: |
Não Informado pela instituição |
Tipo de documento: |
Dissertação
|
Tipo de acesso: |
Acesso aberto |
Idioma: |
por |
Instituição de defesa: |
Não Informado pela instituição
|
Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Não Informado pela instituição
|
Departamento: |
Não Informado pela instituição
|
País: |
Não Informado pela instituição
|
Link de acesso: |
http://hdl.handle.net/10438/9162
|
Resumo: |
With the intention of a better insight, on the evaluation ways, of what is usually called 'subjectives aspects' in the architectural projects, 7 architects were selected and interviewed, choosen by their noted performances, both as professionals and teachers. Initially , in this work, it was presented a number of the more important theoretical standpoints on educational evaluation, with brief incursions in the sociological side of this subject as well. It was immediately observed different points of view, divergent ana/or discrepant, among the various selected authors, hinting a possible polemic ground. For all the interviews, it was used about the same environmental conditions, in a calm, relaxed, unhuxyed place when a list of questionswas asked. The answers being recorded in a tape recorder. unobstructively, but visiblyplaced on a table. It was given guaranty, to the subjects, that there would be no identification of the authorship of their declarations inducting, this way, more 'fluency' and maybe some more 'boldness' in their coments and answers. After this, and already using their statements, it was thought to separate the evaluation insights of each one of the teachers, focusing their points of view, on the objective and subjective aspects of architecture apreisals. Regardless of the various ways of judgement - including non-judgement - as well as the different atitudes, sistema, methods, etc, (some of them conflictant), used by these professors, it was devised a base, a common starting point among them. This identity roots in the observation that 'arts' is imanimously considered, by this group of teachers, as a resultant of the composition of cultural and ideological ingredient, mostly deriving from the material condictions, for a specific historical moment. Architecture, because it is an utilitarian art, is inevitably engaged with ideologies, ita evaluation, as a consequence, being jacent and subjacently conducted accordingly. |