Desempenho e características de fundos de investimentos em renda fixa investidos por regimes próprios de previdência social

• Ano de defesa: 2016
• Autor(a) principal: Almeida, Bernardo Kurka de
• Orientador(a): Pessoa, Marcelo de Sales
• Tipo de documento: Dissertação
• Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
• Idioma: por
• Palavras-chave em Português: Fundos de investimento renda fixa; Análise de desempenho; Persistência de performance; Regimes próprios de previdência (RPPS)
• Palavras-chave em Inglês: Fixed income funds; Performance evaluation; Performance persistence; Pension
• Link de acesso: https://hdl.handle.net/10438/18191

This work analyses the performance, characteristics and persistence of Brazilian bond-funds, that received investments from Regimes de Próprios de Previdência Social (BaseRPPS). Their performance was compared with a sample that contains all bond-funds with CVM classification equal to Fixed Income that are not exclusive and not levareged (BaseRF). The study analyses the characteristics that are present among the top and worst performance funds. The efficiency of fund selection utilizing Sharpe Index was also analyzed. Most literature on performance evaluation have involved stock funds or mutual funds and not bond-funds exclusively. Blake, Elton e Gruber (1993) was one of the first works exclusively on bond-funds. In brazil, most of the exclusive bond funds work have explored models to explain funds returns utilizing different indexes, a smaller number of work explore performance and characteristics. Sample BaseRPPS consists in 282 funds and sample BaseRF contains 1338 funds. The performance evaluation was done using Sharpe Index with CDI as a risk-free benchmark. The results are similar to those found by Rocha (2013), Amaral (2013) e Medeiros (2015). The results are compatible with Market Efficiency, on average the funds did not exceed the risk-free index. Funds of the BaseRPPS sample achieved marginally higher performance then BaseRF sample. Fund characteristics such as size, minimum application value, private bonds and inflation indexation presented positive correlation with best performing funds. Fund fees, number of investors in the fund, fund age and fund classification as fund of fund 'FIC' were negative correlated. The fund selection analysis was made using ex-post information. In each year, ten portfolios where created based on the previous year fund characteristic rankings. Portfolio that selected the highest Sharp Index ratio funds was superior then portfolios that selected highest returns or smallest cost fees. The amount of funds persisting with low Sharp Index on the following year was higher than the amount of funds persisting with high Sharpe Index. The amount of fund closing or merging was twice among the funds in the worst performing portfolio than in the funds among the best portfolio. The portfolio witch selected the 10% lowest cost fees, performed better than the risk free index, on avarege 91% of the funds remained in the portfolio on the following year.