Detalhes bibliográficos
Ano de defesa: |
1980 |
Autor(a) principal: |
Zaslavsky, Irene |
Orientador(a): |
Seminério, Franco Lo Presti |
Banca de defesa: |
Não Informado pela instituição |
Tipo de documento: |
Dissertação
|
Tipo de acesso: |
Acesso aberto |
Idioma: |
por |
Instituição de defesa: |
Não Informado pela instituição
|
Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Não Informado pela instituição
|
Departamento: |
Não Informado pela instituição
|
País: |
Não Informado pela instituição
|
Link de acesso: |
http://hdl.handle.net/10438/9608
|
Resumo: |
The present dissertation discusses the theoretical foundations of Vocational Guidance searching in its history the understanding of the relationship between its basic questions and the dominant thought of the time and examening to what extent actions, attitudes or the methods which are there presented were an advancement over the former ones. Its goals are: 1) retrace the evolution of theories in Vocational Guidance, stressing the diversity of the theoretical infra-structures and comparing them with its main pragmatic out-lines. 2) discuss the limits of personal growth and the manipulation suffered by the oriented in the process of vocational Guidance. 3) demonstrate that, among the determinants of a theoretical Impasse in Vocational Guidance we find a superposition of different questions that represent different forms and conceptions of Vocational guidance. In this study, we presented the different theories in Vocational guidance since Parsons still nowadays, emphasizing the two big theories of the 70's: The 'Operativa Approach' of Pelletier, Noiseux and Bujold as the significative example of the developmental branch, and the 'Clinical Strategy' of Bohoslavsky as the representative of the psicodynamic view. These theories were analysed in their basic contributions and limitations. Based on the theoretical considerations presented herein, suggestions concerning the pratice of Vocational Guidance were presented in its structural and maturational modalities and in its periodic and continous forms. |