Sistema de avaliação ambiental para projetos de edificações públicas (SAAPE)

• Ano de defesa: 2015
• Autor(a) principal: Stival, Carlos Eduardo
• Tipo de documento: Dissertação
• Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
• Idioma: por
• Instituição de defesa: Universidade Positivo; Brasil; Pós-Graduação; Programa de Pós-Graduação em Gestão Ambiental; UP
• Palavras-chave em Português: Edificações; Impacto ambiental- Avaliação; Obras Públicas; CNPQ::CIENCIAS BIOLOGICAS; CNPQ::ENGENHARIAS::ENGENHARIA SANITARIA
• Link de acesso: https://repositorio.cruzeirodosul.edu.br/handle/123456789/2467

The construction is an activity that generates environmental impacts, often negative. Construction activities contracted by the Federal Government represent a great volume and require appropriate planning of the area about to be built, and aims at causing as low impact as possible to the natural ecosystem. Some of the government initiatives to stablish sustainable guidelines were planted, such as the 01/2010 Normative Statement. However, in practice, this statement is still not widely used. This research aims at the necessity of improving the environmental performance of public buildings in order to mitigate the impact caused in the environment itself. The research approaches concepts of sustainability, environmental constructions, buildings life-cycle assessment of energy and environmental management systems certification. Based on three well-known environmental management systems certifications for buildings, by the means of comparison matrices, their categories and criteria were analyzed in order to verify which ones cater the guidelines indicated in IN 01/2010, and which ones are considered the most relevant to appear in the proposed model. SAAPE, the developed tool, consists of six environment performance categories that unfold into 44 points to be obeyed. Such system was applied to three different projects of the Federal Government, in order to validate its systems applicability and to verify the of the projects designed for such Organization. The results show that none of buildings surveyed was possible to obtain the minimum score is 18 points, being between 14 and 15 points. In some other subjects the commitment to the projects qualification regarding its environmental aspects were almost null. On the other hand, despite being considered an embryonic strategy, some solutions concerning the reduction of impacts, have already been made. In practice, the tool which was developed to assist public managers, architects and engineers during the preparation of construction activity projects, aims at making not only the environmental sustainability criteria found in IN 01/2010 respected among them, but also at providing quality improvement opportunities considering the environmental sustainability aspects during the projects’ conception processes.