Avaliação das medidas antropométricas da face em pacientes simétricos e assimétricos

• Ano de defesa: 2020
• Autor(a) principal: Fraiz, Carolina
• Tipo de documento: Dissertação
• Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
• Idioma: por
• Instituição de defesa: Universidade Positivo; Brasil; Pós-Graduação; Programa de Pós-Graduação em Odontologia Clínica
• Palavras-chave em Português: Antropometria; Face; Estética; Pesos e medidas; CNPQ::CIENCIAS DA SAUDE::ODONTOLOGIA
• Link de acesso: https://repositorio.cruzeirodosul.edu.br/handle/123456789/2141

More recently, with the evolution of technology, anthropometric measurements of the face have been performed in 3D, so the aim of this study is to compare the anthropometric measurements of facial soft tissue references in adults between symmetrical and asymmetrical faces. 31 individuals were selected from database of the digital planning center Beyond Digital Solutions (BDS) and they were divided into two groups, individuals with symmetrical face (Group 1) and individuals with asymmetrical face (Group 2). Individuals should have standardized digital photo taking and intra oral scanning, performed by the same professional and using the same equipment. With the aid of the Nemotec Arnetts FAB Software® software, vertical measurements were carried out (Tríqueo to Glabella (Tr-G’); Glabella to Subnasal (G-Sn’); Subnasal to Menton (SnMe’) and horizontal (Right Eurion region up to the left (Eu-Eu’); right to left Zigion region (Zy-Zy’); right to left mandible width (Go-Go’)). anthropometric region of the face. The data were subjected to statistical analysis (Mann-Whitney test, p <0.05). The results showed that between the groups, no significant differences were found in the vertical and horizontal measurements between the symmetrical and asymmetrical faces. For the symmetrical faces, the male gender obtained higher values and with a significant difference in relation to the female gender for the measurements of Tr-G ', G-Sn', Sn-Me 'and Go-Go', presenting a longer face in three thirds and wider in the lower third. For asymmetrical faces, the male gender obtained higher values and with a significant difference in relation to the female gender for the measures Tr-G ', Sn-Me', Eu-Eu 'and Go-Go' presenting a longer and wider face in the upper and lower thirds. Within the limitations and methodology of the present study, we can conclude that the anthropometric measurements of the face between symmetrical and asymmetric faces are similar without regard to sex.