Regulação e governança dos sistemas nacionais de recursos hídricos, no período 1977 - 2010: um estudo comparativo entre Brasil e Canadá

Detalhes bibliográficos
Ano de defesa: 2012
Autor(a) principal: Costa, Mayla Cristina
Orientador(a): Não Informado pela instituição
Banca de defesa: Não Informado pela instituição
Tipo de documento: Tese
Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
Idioma: por
Instituição de defesa: Universidade Positivo
Brasil
Pós-Graduação
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Administração
UP
Programa de Pós-Graduação: Não Informado pela instituição
Departamento: Não Informado pela instituição
País: Não Informado pela instituição
Palavras-chave em Português:
Link de acesso: https://repositorio.cruzeirodosul.edu.br/handle/123456789/2782
Resumo: This study assumes that different geographical contexts have distinct institutional logics, and that this is responsible by influence the creation of different regulative models. Under this framework, it was considered that the interaction between government and organized social actors, in their geographical contexts influence the way globalization and international organizations shape the governance archetypes of national water resources. To this end, we took as basis the dynamics of institutional logics concerning the Community, Market and State in structuring the governance of National Water Resources in Brazil and Canada. The study design was descriptive and exploratory. For this purpose, we used a qualitative approach to strategy crossnational comparative case study with cross sectional and longitudinal perspective, since data were collected in two national contexts corresponding to three different decades. The cut is regarded as a historical landmark in the year 1977, when he made the first world conference dealing specifically with water resources management, and where was established the basic principles to be adopted worldwide in its management until the year 2010, upon completion of data collection. The results showed that different institutional logics variously influence the structure of governance systems. While the logic of Community influence in the formation of governance systems producing situations consistent with practices and governance structures based on interests more cooperative, interpersonal connections and will essentially responsible for shaping the identity of decision makers based on the strong ties between members, the logic of the market influence of systems of governance practices based on individual interests, public sector and self-interest, shaping the identity of its members based on social norms and with a view to maximizing utility. Already, the logic of state influence based on professional practices and democratic participation, shaping the identity of its members based on interest group status and social and economic class. Thus, all configurations of institutional logics interact with the pressures of the world, acting in favor of heterogeneity rather than homogeneity, as provided by more traditional models isomorphic. That said, responding to the research problem, it was found that the Logic of Community, Market and State, together with the identified logical field Logical Navigation, Sanitation and Energy Logic and Industrial Development, were responsible for a process coevolutionary, for different configurations of governance. In Brazil, an integrated and participatory in its formal aspect, but more centralized and formalistic in practice, while in Canada, so cooperative in its formal aspect, but extremely fragmented and overlapping jurisdiction in practice.