Repositórios Institucionais Brasileiros: entre público e privado nos processos de produção e circulação do conhecimento científico

• Ano de defesa: 2018
• Autor(a) principal: Silva, Márcio José
• Tipo de documento: Tese
• Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
• Idioma: por
• Palavras-chave em Português: Análise de Discurso; Repositórios Institucionais; Conhecimento Científico; Livre Acesso à Informação Científica
• Link de acesso: https://repositorio.animaeducacao.com.br/handle/ANIMA/3286

This The main theme of this work is the production and spreading of scientific knowledge nowadays. In order to approach that, our research starts with the Brazilian institutional repositories (RI). In this analysis we try to understand the variety of discursive procedures that specify the way institutional repositories work when it comes to the discourse. Institutional repositories are considered in terms of “public” and “private” in this “research-analysis”. This research was made in accordance with theoretical-methodological assumptions of Discourse Analysis (AD) of French tradition as it appears in the works of Michel Pêcheux, with a materialistic theory of the discursive procedures. Considering the institutional repositories beyond their utilitarian dimension, we aim at deconstructing some evidences in which the institutional repository is defined as “a type of digital library” in order to understand its discursive functioning. In the analysis, we consider how language, unconscious, and ideology relate in a way as to constitute: 1) the sayings and meanings produced through this functioning; and 2) the subjects acting therein. The work presents a theoretical deepening on the notion of archive, promoted by bringing closer the propositions of Jacques Derridá and the way the archive is dealt with in the discursive perspective of Michel Pêcheux. Among the variety of meanings produced in the functioning of the RI, in this dissertation some possible meanings worked with are related to the notions of relevance, legitimacy, utility, authorship, and democratization. The question of democratization of scientific knowledge is broadly discussed in the work. We make this discussion considering that the functioning of the RI is permeated by many discourses, among which are the discourses of transparency and of free access to scientific information. Also, we mobilize the theoretical notion of device, shifting it from the foucauldian perspective to think its functioning in terms of an inscription in the discourse(s), as proposed by Michel Pêcheux. With such a shifting, we go beyond the utilitarian dimension inherent to the functioning of the RI, and we aim at understanding how this matter of democratization of scientific knowledge is currently materialized, in this functioning, in terms of archive policies. By doing that, we work not only to specify some science-technology-administration relations that are present, but also to suggest other possible policies, that is, other ways of saying-doing science and other relations among the subjects in the processes of production and circulation of scientific knowledge.