Detalhes bibliográficos
Ano de defesa: |
2014 |
Autor(a) principal: |
Carmo, André Henrique Nunes do |
Orientador(a): |
Não Informado pela instituição |
Banca de defesa: |
Não Informado pela instituição |
Tipo de documento: |
Dissertação
|
Tipo de acesso: |
Acesso aberto |
Idioma: |
por |
Instituição de defesa: |
Não Informado pela instituição
|
Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Não Informado pela instituição
|
Departamento: |
Não Informado pela instituição
|
País: |
Não Informado pela instituição
|
Palavras-chave em Português: |
|
Link de acesso: |
https://repositorio.animaeducacao.com.br/handle/ANIMA/3282
|
Resumo: |
This dissertation for master degree in Ciências da Linguagem aims to verify if the attempts to delete the representativeness of the political parties in protest messages in June 2013, in Brazil, are related to the different modalities of subject identification proposed by Pêcheux (2009). The corpus selected to be examined was composed by seven protest messages taken from photos of protest signs used on June 16th 2013 in São Paulo and Belo Horizonte. In order to analyze those protest messages, it was used a qualitative and exploratory approach of the studied object, in a proposal based on French Discourse Analysis. Having presented the results, it was possible to infer that those attempts to erase the representativeness could help to understand that, in each definition of position adopted by the subject, he can either super identify with certain position, or disidentify with it. Therefore, it is possible to conclude, from the corpus analysis, based on Pêcheux (2009), where the author deals with three types of identification modalities, that the modality called disidentification would not be a modality itself, but a process produced by the ideology which allows a passage from the Bad subject super identified with that position to disidentify himself from the established subject-form by his Discursive Formation(s). In that process of disidentification, he returns to the modality of identification of Good Subject, but now identified with a subject-form antagonistic to that originally presented in his initial position, so, the subject, super identified to the protester subject-form in a Discursive Formation Resistant to the political parties representativeness, recognizes on Black Bloc subject-form, in an Outraged Discursive Formation, new knowledge which no longer accept the political parties representativeness in a passive way and so it returns to the position expressed in the discourse of Good Subject. |