Political preferences, knowledge, and misinformation about COVID-19 : the case of Brazil
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Publication Date: | 2021 |
| Other Authors: | , , , |
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | eng |
| Source: | Repositório Institucional da UnB |
| Download full: | https://repositorio.unb.br/handle/10482/42629 https://doi.org/10.3389/fpos.2021.646430 |
Summary: | The COVID-19 pandemic has led to a vast research agenda focusing on how citizens acquire knowledge about the virus and the health expert guidelines to protect themselves and their close ones against it. While many countries and regions have been accounted for, there still remains a substantial gap with respect to public opinion about the virus in Latin America, most notably in Brazil, which currently has the second highest in number of fatalities in the world. In this article, we employ a national survey of Brazilians (n = 2,771) to measure and explain knowledge and misinformation about the coronavirus and its illness, COVID-19. Our focus concerns the role of political preferences in a context of high elite polarization with a sitting government that has systematically downplayed the risks associated with the coronavirus and its illness. Our findings are clear: political preferences play a substantial role in explaining differences in knowledge about the coronavirus and COVID-19, more than conventional determinants of learning like motivation, ability, and opportunities. Specifically, we find that supporters of President Jair Bolsonaro—an avid science and COVID-19 denier—know significantly less about the coronavirus and its illness and are more likely to believe in a conspiracy theory that claims that the coronavirus was purposefully created in a Chinese laboratory to promote China's economic power, when compared to Brazilians who are less supportive of him and his government. Our findings carry important implications for how Brazilians take informational cues from political elites in that—even in a major event like a global pandemic—supporters of the president are as likely as ever to “follow their leader” and deny expert-backed scientific evidence. |
| _version_ | 1871442411171872768 |
|---|---|
| author | Gramacho, Wladimir |
| author2 | Turgeon, Mathieu Kennedy, John Stabile, Max Mundim, Pedro Santos |
| author2_role | author author author author |
| author_browse | Gramacho, Wladimir Kennedy, John Mundim, Pedro Santos Stabile, Max Turgeon, Mathieu |
| author_facet | Gramacho, Wladimir Turgeon, Mathieu Kennedy, John Stabile, Max Mundim, Pedro Santos |
| author_role | author |
| bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv | ecaf9cd1a887ebf34c9ebb93dfe9fbc9 ba54f8d1c5f5ec8df897ad678916c701 |
| bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv | MD5 MD5 |
| bitstream.url.fl_str_mv | http://repositorio2.unb.br/jspui/bitstream/10482/42629/1/ARTIGO_PoliticalPreferencesKnowledge.pdf http://repositorio2.unb.br/jspui/bitstream/10482/42629/2/license.txt |
| collection | Repositório Institucional da UnB |
| dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv | Gramacho, Wladimir Turgeon, Mathieu Kennedy, John Stabile, Max Mundim, Pedro Santos |
| dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv | 2021-12-24T15:30:26Z |
| dc.date.available.fl_str_mv | 2021-12-24T15:30:26Z |
| dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv | 2021-05 |
| dc.identifier.citation.fl_str_mv | GRAMACHO, Wladimir et al. Political preferences, knowledge, and misinformation about COVID-19: the case of Brazil. Frontiers in Political Science. v. 3, 646430, maio 2021. DOI: 10.3389/fpos.2021.646430. Disponível em: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpos.2021.646430/full. Acesso em: 24 dez. 2021. |
| dc.identifier.doi.pt_BR.fl_str_mv | https://doi.org/10.3389/fpos.2021.646430 |
| dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv | https://repositorio.unb.br/handle/10482/42629 |
| dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv | eng |
| dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv | Frontiers |
| dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| dc.source.none.fl_str_mv | reponame:Repositório Institucional da UnB instname:Universidade de Brasília (UnB) instacron:UNB |
| dc.subject.keyword.pt_BR.fl_str_mv | Covid-19 Desinformação Preferências políticas |
| dc.title.pt_BR.fl_str_mv | Political preferences, knowledge, and misinformation about COVID-19 : the case of Brazil |
| dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv | info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
| dc.type.status.fl_str_mv | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
| description | The COVID-19 pandemic has led to a vast research agenda focusing on how citizens acquire knowledge about the virus and the health expert guidelines to protect themselves and their close ones against it. While many countries and regions have been accounted for, there still remains a substantial gap with respect to public opinion about the virus in Latin America, most notably in Brazil, which currently has the second highest in number of fatalities in the world. In this article, we employ a national survey of Brazilians (n = 2,771) to measure and explain knowledge and misinformation about the coronavirus and its illness, COVID-19. Our focus concerns the role of political preferences in a context of high elite polarization with a sitting government that has systematically downplayed the risks associated with the coronavirus and its illness. Our findings are clear: political preferences play a substantial role in explaining differences in knowledge about the coronavirus and COVID-19, more than conventional determinants of learning like motivation, ability, and opportunities. Specifically, we find that supporters of President Jair Bolsonaro—an avid science and COVID-19 denier—know significantly less about the coronavirus and its illness and are more likely to believe in a conspiracy theory that claims that the coronavirus was purposefully created in a Chinese laboratory to promote China's economic power, when compared to Brazilians who are less supportive of him and his government. Our findings carry important implications for how Brazilians take informational cues from political elites in that—even in a major event like a global pandemic—supporters of the president are as likely as ever to “follow their leader” and deny expert-backed scientific evidence. |
| eu_rights_str_mv | openAccess |
| format | article |
| id | UNB_9823becea295111f2f9fb3e2e34c2e2d |
| identifier_str_mv | GRAMACHO, Wladimir et al. Political preferences, knowledge, and misinformation about COVID-19: the case of Brazil. Frontiers in Political Science. v. 3, 646430, maio 2021. DOI: 10.3389/fpos.2021.646430. Disponível em: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpos.2021.646430/full. Acesso em: 24 dez. 2021. |
| instacron_str | UNB |
| institution | UNB |
| instname_str | Universidade de Brasília (UnB) |
| language | eng |
| network_acronym_str | UNB |
| network_name_str | Repositório Institucional da UnB |
| oai_identifier_str | oai:repositorio.unb.br:10482/42629 |
| publishDate | 2021 |
| publishDateSort | 2021 |
| publisher.none.fl_str_mv | Frontiers |
| reponame_str | Repositório Institucional da UnB |
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv | repositorio@unb.br |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv | Repositório Institucional da UnB - Universidade de Brasília (UnB) |
| repository_id_str | |
| spelling | Gramacho, WladimirTurgeon, MathieuKennedy, JohnStabile, MaxMundim, Pedro Santos2021-12-24T15:30:26Z2021-12-24T15:30:26Z2021-05GRAMACHO, Wladimir et al. Political preferences, knowledge, and misinformation about COVID-19: the case of Brazil. Frontiers in Political Science. v. 3, 646430, maio 2021. DOI: 10.3389/fpos.2021.646430. Disponível em: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpos.2021.646430/full. Acesso em: 24 dez. 2021.https://repositorio.unb.br/handle/10482/42629https://doi.org/10.3389/fpos.2021.646430FrontiersCopyright © 2021 Gramacho, Turgeon, Kennedy, Stabile and Mundim. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessPolitical preferences, knowledge, and misinformation about COVID-19 : the case of Brazilinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleCovid-19DesinformaçãoPreferências políticasThe COVID-19 pandemic has led to a vast research agenda focusing on how citizens acquire knowledge about the virus and the health expert guidelines to protect themselves and their close ones against it. While many countries and regions have been accounted for, there still remains a substantial gap with respect to public opinion about the virus in Latin America, most notably in Brazil, which currently has the second highest in number of fatalities in the world. In this article, we employ a national survey of Brazilians (n = 2,771) to measure and explain knowledge and misinformation about the coronavirus and its illness, COVID-19. Our focus concerns the role of political preferences in a context of high elite polarization with a sitting government that has systematically downplayed the risks associated with the coronavirus and its illness. Our findings are clear: political preferences play a substantial role in explaining differences in knowledge about the coronavirus and COVID-19, more than conventional determinants of learning like motivation, ability, and opportunities. Specifically, we find that supporters of President Jair Bolsonaro—an avid science and COVID-19 denier—know significantly less about the coronavirus and its illness and are more likely to believe in a conspiracy theory that claims that the coronavirus was purposefully created in a Chinese laboratory to promote China's economic power, when compared to Brazilians who are less supportive of him and his government. Our findings carry important implications for how Brazilians take informational cues from political elites in that—even in a major event like a global pandemic—supporters of the president are as likely as ever to “follow their leader” and deny expert-backed scientific evidence.Faculdade de Comunicação (FAC)Departamento de Jornalismo (FAC JOR)engreponame:Repositório Institucional da UnBinstname:Universidade de Brasília (UnB)instacron:UNBORIGINALARTIGO_PoliticalPreferencesKnowledge.pdfARTIGO_PoliticalPreferencesKnowledge.pdfapplication/pdf412262http://repositorio2.unb.br/jspui/bitstream/10482/42629/1/ARTIGO_PoliticalPreferencesKnowledge.pdfecaf9cd1a887ebf34c9ebb93dfe9fbc9MD51open accessLICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain163http://repositorio2.unb.br/jspui/bitstream/10482/42629/2/license.txtba54f8d1c5f5ec8df897ad678916c701MD52open access10482/426292023-06-21 00:16:35.654open accessoai:repositorio.unb.br:10482/42629U3VibWlzc8OjbyBlZmV0aXZhZGEgcG9yIGludGVncmFudGUgZGEgZXF1aXBlIGRvIFJlcG9zaXTDs3JpbyBJbnN0aXR1Y2lvbmFsIGRhIFVuQiBkZSBhY29yZG8gY29tIGxpY2Vuw6dhIGNvbmNlZGlkYSBwZWxvIGF1dG9yIGUvb3UgZGV0ZW50b3IgZG9zIGRpcmVpdG9zIGF1dG9yYWlzLg==Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttps://repositorio.unb.br/oai/requestrepositorio@unb.bropendoar:2023-06-21T03:16:35Repositório Institucional da UnB - Universidade de Brasília (UnB) |
| spellingShingle | Political preferences, knowledge, and misinformation about COVID-19 : the case of Brazil Gramacho, Wladimir Covid-19 Desinformação Preferências políticas |
| status_str | publishedVersion |
| title | Political preferences, knowledge, and misinformation about COVID-19 : the case of Brazil |
| title_full | Political preferences, knowledge, and misinformation about COVID-19 : the case of Brazil |
| title_fullStr | Political preferences, knowledge, and misinformation about COVID-19 : the case of Brazil |
| title_full_unstemmed | Political preferences, knowledge, and misinformation about COVID-19 : the case of Brazil |
| title_short | Political preferences, knowledge, and misinformation about COVID-19 : the case of Brazil |
| title_sort | Political preferences, knowledge, and misinformation about COVID-19 : the case of Brazil |
| topic | Covid-19 Desinformação Preferências políticas |
| url | https://repositorio.unb.br/handle/10482/42629 https://doi.org/10.3389/fpos.2021.646430 |