Performance analysis of deep convolutional autoencoders with different patch sizes for change detection from burnt areas

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Bem, Pablo Pozzobon de
Publication Date: 2020
Other Authors: Carvalho Júnior, Osmar Abílio de, Carvalho, Osmar Luiz Ferreira de, Gomes, Roberto Arnaldo Trancoso, Guimarães, Renato Fontes
Format: Article
Language: eng
Source: Repositório Institucional da UnB
Download full: https://repositorio.unb.br/handle/10482/43715
https://orcid.org/ 0000-0003-3868-8704
https://orcid.org/ 0000-0002-0346-1684
https://orcid.org/ 0000-0002-5619-8525
https://orcid.org/ 0000-0003-4724-4064
https://orcid.org/ 0000-0002-9555-043X
Summary: Fire is one of the primary sources of damages to natural environments globally. Estimates show that approximately 4 million km2 of land burns yearly. Studies have shown that such estimates often underestimate the real extent of burnt land, which highlights the need to find better, state-of-the-art methods to detect and classify these areas. This study aimed to analyze the use of deep convolutional Autoencoders in the classification of burnt areas, considering di erent sample patch sizes. A simple Autoencoder and the U-Net and ResUnet architectures were evaluated. We collected Landsat 8 OLI+ data from three scenes in four consecutive dates to detect the changes specifically in the form of burnt land. The data were sampled according to four di erent sampling strategies to evaluate possible performance changes related to sampling window sizes. The training stage used two scenes, while the validation stage used the remaining scene. The ground truth change mask was created using the Normalized Burn Ratio (NBR) spectral index through a thresholding approach. The classifications were evaluated according to the F1 index, Kappa index, and mean Intersection over Union (mIoU) value. Results have shown that the U-Net and ResUnet architectures offered the best classifications with average F1, Kappa, and mIoU values of approximately 0.96, representing excellent classification results. We have also verified that a sampling window size of 256 by 256 pixels offered the best results.