Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"whose imputation in objective programming" » "whose computation in objective programming" (Expand search), "the imputation in objective programming" (Expand search), "wide imputation in objective programming" (Expand search), "whose mutation in objective programming" (Expand search), "whose imputation of objective programming" (Expand search), "whose implantation in objective programming" (Expand search), "whose imputation an objective programming" (Expand search), "whose imputation on objective programming" (Expand search), "whose imputation and objective programming" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"whose imputation in objective programming\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( whose imputation in objective programming ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("whose imputation in objective programming") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.