Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"whose imputation in object programming" » "whose imputation in subject programming" (Expand search), "whose imputation in objective programming" (Expand search), "whose imputation in content programming" (Expand search), "whose computation in object programming" (Expand search), "the imputation in object programming" (Expand search), "wide imputation in object programming" (Expand search), "whose mutation in object programming" (Expand search), "whose imputation of object programming" (Expand search), "whose implantation in object programming" (Expand search), "whose imputation an object programming" (Expand search), "whose imputation en object programming" (Expand search), "whose imputation and object programming" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"whose imputation in object programming\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( whose imputation in object programming ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("whose imputation in object programming") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.