Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"whose implications on coverage problem" » "dose implications on coverage problem" (Expand search), "the implications on coverage problem" (Expand search), "some implications on coverage problem" (Expand search), "whose implications on covering problem" (Expand search), "whose implications on covering problems" (Expand search), "whose implications on coverage from" (Expand search), "whose implications of coverage problem" (Expand search), "whose implications in coverage problem" (Expand search), "whose implications _ coverage problem" (Expand search), "whose implications bone coverage problem" (Expand search), "whose implications and coverage problem" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("whose implications on coverage problem") OR ("using coding python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"whose implications on coverage problem\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( whose implications on coverage problem ) OR ( using coding python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("whose implications on coverage problem") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.