Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"whose implications in scripting program" » "dose implications in scripting program" (Expand search), "the implications in scripting program" (Expand search), "some implications in scripting program" (Expand search), "whose implications in screening program" (Expand search), "whose implications in writing program" (Expand search), "whose implications in screening programs" (Expand search), "whose implications _ scripting program" (Expand search), "whose implications of scripting program" (Expand search), "whose applications in scripting program" (Expand search), "whose implications mind scripting program" (Expand search), "whose implications in scraping program" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("whose implications in scripting program") OR ("using coding python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"whose implications in scripting program\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))*".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( whose implications in scripting program ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))*.