Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"whose implications in coverage from" » "dose implications in coverage from" (Expand search), "the implications in coverage from" (Expand search), "some implications in coverage from" (Expand search), "whose implications _ coverage from" (Expand search), "whose implications of coverage from" (Expand search), "whose applications in coverage from" (Expand search), "whose implications in beverage from" (Expand search), "whose implications in coverage of" (Expand search), "whose implications in coverage on" (Expand search), "whose implications and coverage from" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("whose implications in coverage from") OR ("using coding python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"whose implications in coverage from\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( whose implications in coverage from ) OR ( using coding python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("whose implications in coverage from") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.