Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"whose implication in coverage problem" » "the implication in coverage problem" (Expand search), "dose implications in coverage problem" (Expand search), "hostess implication in coverage problem" (Expand search), "whose implication in covering problem" (Expand search), "whose implication in covering problems" (Expand search), "whose implication in coverage from" (Expand search), "whose implications in coverage problem" (Expand search), "whose implications on coverage problem" (Expand search), "whose implication of coverage problem" (Expand search), "whose implication and coverage problem" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"whose implication in coverage problem\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( whose implication in coverage problem ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("whose implication in coverage problem") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.