Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"whose implication in coverage on" » "the implication in coverage on" (Expand search), "dose implications in coverage on" (Expand search), "hostess implication in coverage on" (Expand search), "whose implications in coverage on" (Expand search), "whose implications on coverage on" (Expand search), "whose implication of coverage on" (Expand search), "whose implication and coverage on" (Expand search), "whose implication in coverage of" (Expand search), "whose implication in coverage in" (Expand search), "whose implication in coverage and" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("whose implication in coverage on") OR ("using coding python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"whose implication in coverage on\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))*".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( whose implication in coverage on ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))*.