Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"whose computations using recursive processing" » "whose computations using reactive processing" (Expand search), "whose computations using reflexive processing" (Expand search), "whose computations using predictive processing" (Expand search), "whose computation using recursive processing" (Expand search), "these computations using recursive processing" (Expand search), "pose computation using recursive processing" (Expand search), "whose populations using recursive processing" (Expand search), "whose computations in recursive processing" (Expand search), "whose computations using recurrence processing" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("whose computations using recursive processing") OR ("using coding python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"whose computations using recursive processing\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))*".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( whose computations using recursive processing ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))*.