Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"whose computations using explosive programming" » "whose computations using inclusive programming" (Expand search), "whose computations using copositive programming" (Expand search), "whose computations using expression programming" (Expand search), "whose computation using explosive programming" (Expand search), "these computations using explosive programming" (Expand search), "pose computation using explosive programming" (Expand search), "whose populations using explosive programming" (Expand search), "whose computations in explosive programming" (Expand search), "whose computations using exclusive programming" (Expand search), "whose computations point explosive programming" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("whose computations using explosive programming") OR ("using coding python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"whose computations using explosive programming\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))*".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( whose computations using explosive programming ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))*.