Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"whose computations in constructing and" » "whose computation in constructing and" (Expand search), "these computations in constructing and" (Expand search), "pose computation in constructing and" (Expand search), "whose computations in constructions and" (Expand search), "whose computations in construction and" (Expand search), "whose computations in constructing _" (Expand search), "whose computation of constructing and" (Expand search), "whose computation and constructing and" (Expand search), "whose computations _ constructing and" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("whose computations in constructing and") OR ("using coding python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"whose computations in constructing and\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( whose computations in constructing and ) OR ( using coding python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("whose computations in constructing and") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.