Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"whose computational visual coverage in" » "whose computacional visual coverage in" (Expand search), "whose computational visuality coverage in" (Expand search), "whose computational vision coverage in" (Expand search), "whose computation visual coverage in" (Expand search), "the computational visual coverage in" (Expand search), "some computational visual coverage in" (Expand search), "whose computational signal coverage in" (Expand search), "whose computational vegetal coverage in" (Expand search), "whose computational vacinal coverage in" (Expand search), "whose computational visual coverage of" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("whose computational visual coverage in") OR ("using coding python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"whose computational visual coverage in\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( whose computational visual coverage in ) OR ( using coding python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("whose computational visual coverage in") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.