Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"whose computational values coverage on" » "whose computational issues coverage on" (Expand search), "whose computational bases coverage on" (Expand search), "whose computational analyses coverage on" (Expand search), "whose computation values coverage on" (Expand search), "the computational values coverage on" (Expand search), "some computational values coverage on" (Expand search), "whose computational values corporate on" (Expand search), "whose computational changes coverage on" (Expand search), "whose computational values coverage of" (Expand search), "whose computational values coverage in" (Expand search), "whose computational values coverage and" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"whose computational values coverage on\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( whose computational values coverage on ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("whose computational values coverage on") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.