Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"whose computational roots coverage in" » "whose computation roots coverage in" (Expand search), "the computational roots coverage in" (Expand search), "some computational roots coverage in" (Expand search), "whose computational foot coverage in" (Expand search), "whose computational cost coverage in" (Expand search), "whose computational codes coverage in" (Expand search), "whose computational root coverage in" (Expand search), "whose computational sports coverage in" (Expand search), "whose computational its coverage in" (Expand search), "whose computational roots coverage of" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"whose computational roots coverage in\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( whose computational roots coverage in ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("whose computational roots coverage in") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.