Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"whose computational robot coverage on" » "whose computation robot coverage on" (Expand search), "the computational robot coverage on" (Expand search), "some computational robot coverage on" (Expand search), "whose computational roots coverage on" (Expand search), "whose computacional robo coverage on" (Expand search), "whose computational cost coverage on" (Expand search), "whose computational root coverage on" (Expand search), "whose computational robot coverage of" (Expand search), "whose computational robot coverage in" (Expand search), "whose computational robot coverage and" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("whose computational robot coverage on") OR ("using coding python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"whose computational robot coverage on\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( whose computational robot coverage on ) OR ( using coding python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("whose computational robot coverage on") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.