Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"whose computational paths coverage from" » "whose computation paths coverage from" (Expand search), "the computational paths coverage from" (Expand search), "some computational paths coverage from" (Expand search), "whose computational data coverage from" (Expand search), "whose computational and coverage from" (Expand search), "whose computational art coverage from" (Expand search), "whose computational path coverage from" (Expand search), "whose computational press coverage from" (Expand search), "whose computational its coverage from" (Expand search), "whose computational paths beverage from" (Expand search), "whose computational paths coverage of" (Expand search), "whose computational paths coverage on" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"whose computational paths coverage from\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( whose computational paths coverage from ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("whose computational paths coverage from") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.