Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"whose computational numerical coverage on" » "whose computation numerical coverage on" (Expand search), "the computational numerical coverage on" (Expand search), "some computational numerical coverage on" (Expand search), "whose computational superficial coverage on" (Expand search), "whose computational numerical modelagem on" (Expand search), "whose computational lexical coverage on" (Expand search), "whose computational numerical coverage of" (Expand search), "whose computational numerical coverage in" (Expand search), "whose computational numerical coverage and" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("whose computational numerical coverage on") OR ("using coding python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"whose computational numerical coverage on\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))*".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( whose computational numerical coverage on ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))*.