Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"whose computational models coverage and" » "whose computational model coverage and" (Expand search), "whose computational modeling coverage and" (Expand search), "whose computational modelling coverage and" (Expand search), "whose computation models coverage and" (Expand search), "the computational models coverage and" (Expand search), "some computational models coverage and" (Expand search), "whose computational code coverage and" (Expand search), "whose computational model average and" (Expand search), "whose computational models covariance and" (Expand search), "whose computational models coverage in" (Expand search), "whose computational models coverage of" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("whose computational models coverage and") OR ("using coding python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"whose computational models coverage and\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))*".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( whose computational models coverage and ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))*.