Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"whose computational maximal coverage in" » "whose computacional maximo coverage in" (Expand search), "whose computational thermal coverage in" (Expand search), "whose computational artmap coverage in" (Expand search), "whose computation maximal coverage in" (Expand search), "the computational maximal coverage in" (Expand search), "some computational maximal coverage in" (Expand search), "whose computational maximum coverage in" (Expand search), "whose computational maximal covering in" (Expand search), "whose computational vacinal coverage in" (Expand search), "whose computational maximal coverage of" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"whose computational maximal coverage in\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( whose computational maximal coverage in ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("whose computational maximal coverage in") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.