Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"whose computational logical coverage on" » "whose computational logic coverage on" (Expand search), "whose computacional logica coverage on" (Expand search), "whose computational numerical coverage on" (Expand search), "whose computation logical coverage on" (Expand search), "the computational logical coverage on" (Expand search), "some computational logical coverage on" (Expand search), "whose computational lexical coverage on" (Expand search), "whose computational local coverage on" (Expand search), "whose computational ecological coverage on" (Expand search), "whose computational logical coverage of" (Expand search), "whose computational logical coverage in" (Expand search), "whose computational logical coverage and" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"whose computational logical coverage on\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( whose computational logical coverage on ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("whose computational logical coverage on") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.