Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"whose computational logic coverage on" » "whose computation logic coverage on" (Expand search), "the computational logic coverage on" (Expand search), "some computational logic coverage on" (Expand search), "whose computational cost coverage on" (Expand search), "whose computational code coverage on" (Expand search), "whose computational biology coverage on" (Expand search), "whose computational biologic coverage on" (Expand search), "whose computational low coverage on" (Expand search), "whose computational local coverage on" (Expand search), "whose computational logic coverage of" (Expand search), "whose computational logic coverage in" (Expand search), "whose computational logic coverage and" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("whose computational logic coverage on") OR ("using coding python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"whose computational logic coverage on\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))*".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( whose computational logic coverage on ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))*.