Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"whose computational lexical coverage from" » "whose computational logical coverage from" (Expand search), "whose computational numerical coverage from" (Expand search), "whose computational political coverage from" (Expand search), "whose computation lexical coverage from" (Expand search), "the computational lexical coverage from" (Expand search), "some computational lexical coverage from" (Expand search), "whose computational maximal coverage from" (Expand search), "whose computational local coverage from" (Expand search), "whose computational lexical beverage from" (Expand search), "whose computational lexical coverage of" (Expand search), "whose computational lexical coverage on" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("whose computational lexical coverage from") OR ("using coding python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"whose computational lexical coverage from\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))*".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( whose computational lexical coverage from ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))*.