Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"whose computational lexical coverage and" » "whose computational logical coverage and" (Expand search), "whose computational numerical coverage and" (Expand search), "whose computational political coverage and" (Expand search), "whose computation lexical coverage and" (Expand search), "the computational lexical coverage and" (Expand search), "some computational lexical coverage and" (Expand search), "whose computational maximal coverage and" (Expand search), "whose computational local coverage and" (Expand search), "whose computational lexical coverage in" (Expand search), "whose computational lexical coverage of" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"whose computational lexical coverage and\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( whose computational lexical coverage and ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("whose computational lexical coverage and") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.