Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"whose computational initial coverage in" » "whose computational political coverage in" (Expand search), "whose computational social coverage in" (Expand search), "whose computational analytical coverage in" (Expand search), "whose computation initial coverage in" (Expand search), "the computational initial coverage in" (Expand search), "some computational initial coverage in" (Expand search), "whose computational spatial coverage in" (Expand search), "whose computational partial coverage in" (Expand search), "whose computational initial coverage of" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("whose computational initial coverage in") OR ("using coding python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"whose computational initial coverage in\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( whose computational initial coverage in ) OR ( using coding python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("whose computational initial coverage in") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.