Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"whose computational fact complexity from" » "whose computation fact complexity from" (Expand search), "the computational fact complexity from" (Expand search), "some computational fact complexity from" (Expand search), "whose computational art complexity from" (Expand search), "whose computational foot complexity from" (Expand search), "whose computational effect complexity from" (Expand search), "whose computational gait complexity from" (Expand search), "whose computational at complexity from" (Expand search), "whose computational facing complexity from" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("whose computational fact complexity from") OR ("using coding python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"whose computational fact complexity from\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( whose computational fact complexity from ) OR ( using coding python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("whose computational fact complexity from") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.