Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"whose computational code coverage in" » "whose computation code coverage in" (Expand search), "the computational code coverage in" (Expand search), "some computational code coverage in" (Expand search), "whose computational model coverage in" (Expand search), "whose computational cost coverage in" (Expand search), "whose computational models coverage in" (Expand search), "whose computational care coverage in" (Expand search), "whose computational and coverage in" (Expand search), "whose computational the coverage in" (Expand search), "whose computational code coverage of" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("whose computational code coverage in") OR ("using coding python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"whose computational code coverage in\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( whose computational code coverage in ) OR ( using coding python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("whose computational code coverage in") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.