Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"whose computational code coverage and" » "whose computation code coverage and" (Expand search), "the computational code coverage and" (Expand search), "some computational code coverage and" (Expand search), "whose computational model coverage and" (Expand search), "whose computational cost coverage and" (Expand search), "whose computational models coverage and" (Expand search), "whose computational care coverage and" (Expand search), "whose computational and coverage and" (Expand search), "whose computational the coverage and" (Expand search), "whose computational code coverage in" (Expand search), "whose computational code coverage of" (Expand search)
"using using python python programming" » "using using pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using using piton python programming" (Expand search), "using using pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using usando python python programming" (Expand search), "using in python python programming" (Expand search), "using fusing python python programming" (Expand search), "housing using python python programming" (Expand search), "nursing using python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("whose computational code coverage and") OR ("using using python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"whose computational code coverage and\") OR (\"using using python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( whose computational code coverage and ) OR ( using using python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("whose computational code coverage and") OR ("using using python python programming"))*.