Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"whose computational biologic coverage on" » "whose computational biology coverage on" (Expand search), "whose computational logic coverage on" (Expand search), "whose computacional biology coverage on" (Expand search), "whose computation biologic coverage on" (Expand search), "the computational biologic coverage on" (Expand search), "some computational biologic coverage on" (Expand search), "whose computational pedologic coverage on" (Expand search), "whose computational ecological coverage on" (Expand search), "whose computational pedological coverage on" (Expand search), "whose computational biologic coverage of" (Expand search), "whose computational biologic coverage in" (Expand search), "whose computational biologic coverage and" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"whose computational biologic coverage on\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( whose computational biologic coverage on ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("whose computational biologic coverage on") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.