Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"whose computation visual coverage in" » "whose computational visual coverage in" (Expand search), "whose computacional visual coverage in" (Expand search), "whose computacao visual coverage in" (Expand search), "pose computation visual coverage in" (Expand search), "these computations visual coverage in" (Expand search), "the computation visual coverage in" (Expand search), "whose computation signal coverage in" (Expand search), "whose computation vegetal coverage in" (Expand search), "whose computation vacinal coverage in" (Expand search), "whose computation visual coverage of" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("whose computation visual coverage in") OR ("using coding python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"whose computation visual coverage in\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))*".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( whose computation visual coverage in ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))*.