Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"whose computation using fragment programming" » "whose computation using agent programming" (Expand search), "whose computation using driven programming" (Expand search), "whose computation using training programming" (Expand search), "pose computation using fragment programming" (Expand search), "these computations using fragment programming" (Expand search), "the computation using fragment programming" (Expand search), "whose computations using fragment programming" (Expand search), "whose computation in fragment programming" (Expand search), "whose composition using fragment programming" (Expand search), "whose computation using segment programming" (Expand search), "whose computation rain fragment programming" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("whose computation using fragment programming") OR ("using coding python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"whose computation using fragment programming\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))*".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( whose computation using fragment programming ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))*.