Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"whose computation using constructs and" » "pose computation using constructs and" (Expand search), "these computations using constructs and" (Expand search), "the computation using constructs and" (Expand search), "whose computations using constructs and" (Expand search), "whose computation in constructs and" (Expand search), "whose composition using constructs and" (Expand search), "whose computation using constructal and" (Expand search), "whose computation using constructed and" (Expand search), "whose computation using constraints and" (Expand search), "whose computation using construct and" (Expand search), "whose computation using constructions and" (Expand search), "whose computation using construction and" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"whose computation using constructs and\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( whose computation using constructs and ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("whose computation using constructs and") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.