Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"whose computation using constructions in" » "whose computation focusing constructions in" (Expand search), "whose computation housing construction in" (Expand search), "whose computation nursing construction in" (Expand search), "pose computation using constructions in" (Expand search), "these computations using constructions in" (Expand search), "the computation using constructions in" (Expand search), "whose computations using constructions in" (Expand search), "whose computation in constructions in" (Expand search), "whose composition using constructions in" (Expand search), "whose computation using construction in" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"whose computation using constructions in\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( whose computation using constructions in ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("whose computation using constructions in") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.