Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"whose computation using conductive programming" » "whose computation using inductive programming" (Expand search), "whose computation using collective programming" (Expand search), "whose computation using objective programming" (Expand search), "pose computation using conductive programming" (Expand search), "these computations using conductive programming" (Expand search), "the computation using conductive programming" (Expand search), "whose computations using conductive programming" (Expand search), "whose computation in conductive programming" (Expand search), "whose composition using conductive programming" (Expand search), "whose computation using reductive programming" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"whose computation using conductive programming\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( whose computation using conductive programming ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("whose computation using conductive programming") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.