Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"whose computation theory computing and" » "whose computational theory computing and" (Expand search), "whose imputation theory computing and" (Expand search), "whose compensation theory computing and" (Expand search), "pose computation theory computing and" (Expand search), "these computations theory computing and" (Expand search), "the computation theory computing and" (Expand search), "whose computation their computing and" (Expand search), "whose computation theory comparing and" (Expand search), "whose computation the computing and" (Expand search), "whose computation theory computing _" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"whose computation theory computing and\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( whose computation theory computing and ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("whose computation theory computing and") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.