Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"whose computation the coverage on" » "pose computation the coverage on" (Expand search), "these computations the coverage on" (Expand search), "the computation the coverage on" (Expand search), "whose computation to coverage on" (Expand search), "whose computation theory coverage on" (Expand search), "whose computation with coverage on" (Expand search), "whose computation and coverage on" (Expand search), "whose computation the coverage of" (Expand search), "whose computation the coverage in" (Expand search), "whose computation the coverage and" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("whose computation the coverage on") OR ("using coding python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"whose computation the coverage on\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( whose computation the coverage on ) OR ( using coding python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("whose computation the coverage on") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.