Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"whose computation practical coverage on" » "whose computational practical coverage on" (Expand search), "whose competition practical coverage on" (Expand search), "whose computation fractional coverage on" (Expand search), "whose computation political coverage on" (Expand search), "whose computation partial coverage on" (Expand search), "whose computation critical coverage on" (Expand search), "pose computation practical coverage on" (Expand search), "these computations practical coverage on" (Expand search), "the computation practical coverage on" (Expand search), "whose computation practical coverage of" (Expand search), "whose computation practical coverage in" (Expand search), "whose computation practical coverage and" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"whose computation practical coverage on\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( whose computation practical coverage on ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("whose computation practical coverage on") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.