Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"whose computation paths coverage in" » "pose computation paths coverage in" (Expand search), "these computations paths coverage in" (Expand search), "the computation paths coverage in" (Expand search), "whose computational paths coverage in" (Expand search), "whose computation graphs coverage in" (Expand search), "whose computation with coverage in" (Expand search), "whose computation path coverage in" (Expand search), "whose computation press coverage in" (Expand search), "whose computation its coverage in" (Expand search), "whose computation paths coverage of" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"whose computation paths coverage in\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( whose computation paths coverage in ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("whose computation paths coverage in") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.