Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"whose computation oriented computing code" » "whose communication oriented computing code" (Expand search), "whose competition orientada computing code" (Expand search), "whose adaptation oriented computing code" (Expand search), "pose computation oriented computing code" (Expand search), "these computations oriented computing code" (Expand search), "the computation oriented computing code" (Expand search), "whose computation oriented computing ode" (Expand search), "whose computation oriented computing pode" (Expand search), "whose computation oriented computing model" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("whose computation oriented computing code") OR ("using coding python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"whose computation oriented computing code\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))*".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( whose computation oriented computing code ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))*.